Sunday, October 13, 2013

My oil paintings: portraits and human figures

Here are some portraits & figures painted in the studio with live models:

(For still life and landscapes, please see my blog on Sept. 28, 2013.)

A.  Nude figures:


(12x16) 2014

After bath (12x16), 2014

(16x20)
                                                                      
                                       
(12x16)(N/A)


                                                                          
B:  Portraits & Figures



A young girl in white dress (16x20, 2014)

Yellow light (16x20, 2016)

waiting (12x16)

Reverie (12x16)

Portrait of a fellow artist (11x14, 2016, 2014)

Red dress (12x16, 2014)

Pensive (12x16)

pink scarf

Blond


Chinese minority woman (N/A)

imitating Zorn (N/A)








Wednesday, October 2, 2013

In search of my roots - A visit to the Huhhot Museum (2004)

The Huhhot Museum of Inner Mongolia

Huhhot (呼和浩特, meaning "Green City" in Mongolian)is the capital of Inner Mongolia, China.  The Huhhot museum is a big, square, modern building erected in 1957, covering an area of 3,500 square meters.  The collections that it houses belong in four categories: natural history, (including the famed, enormous dinosaur fossils), archeology, folk customs, and modern history, the latter with emphasis on the social development of Inner Mongolia under communist rule since 1949For there can be no denying the magnitude of the social development that has taken place in this region.  Huhhot more than trebled its population since the late 1920s, after completion of the railway connecting it to Beijing and Tientsin to the east, and Baotou to the west. 
The sight of the construction sites that rise everywhere, and the chemical plants, and other evident marks of modernity, leave us no doubt that this is an important industrial center.  It is also the site of a university –the first medical school in Inner Mongolia was established here. But none of this is the main focus of our interest.  We have come impelled by the idea, perhaps inexcusably fanciful and overly romantic, of looking into the heart and soul of Mongolia, and on this score we begin to feel a little disappointed. 
 The Huhhot Museum receives the visitor with an equestrian statue of Genghis at the entrance (Fig. 1), a symbol of the pride universally felt for the renowned warrior in this land.  A justified pride admittedly; but not much else reminds us of his person inside the building.  This museum boasts a total collection of 10,000 objects, among which the most renowned are complete skeletons of fossilized pre-historical herbivore dinosaurs. The largest one is immense: 26 meters long, and a shoulder height of 6 meters, which could reach 12 meters with the extended neck and head.  Another smaller dinosaur, a special variety of the Mongolian highland, measures a “mere” 7.5 m in length.  In addition, there is also a complete skeleton of a mammoth, which stands 4.7 meters high and 9 meters long (Fig. 2).  

Fig. 1.  Statue of Genghis Khn at the entrance of the Huhhot Museum

Fig. 2  Skeleton of a mammoth

 Historically, the Han people, the dominant ethnic group in China, regarded the Mongols as unsophisticated, and in many ways inferior.   And what are we to say about the unalloyed racism with which they have been treated in the West?  Here, prominent intellectuals have been tainted with prejudice, always classifying the Mongols as ethnically “inferior” and denying them any important historical achievement, apart from acting as a plague for the rest of humankind.  One of the most infamous of them, the French aristocrat and distinguished man of letters, Count Arthur de Gobineau (1816-1882), went as far as to assert that the Mongols would have been incapable of accomplishing the astounding military conquests that they did if they had not been mixed with some “white” people, the Hakas of Southern Siberia.  Without the “felicitous presence” of these “white principles diffused throughout the yellow multitudes” and the consequent superiority of this admixing, wrote Gobineau, it would be impossible to account for the formation of the great armies “that at different times came out of Central Asia with the Huns, the Mongols of Genghis Khan, the Tartars of Timur…”.1   Yet Mongoloid people form one of the major human ethnic groups, and archeological finds in the region that we now visit have included man-made objects dating back 700,000 years.  During the Neolithic era, the inhabitants of the grassland already produced beautiful artifacts.  A jade “hog-dragon,” a museum piece carved 5,000-6,000 years ago, was found in the Hong Shan (红山 “Red Mountain”) County of east Inner Mongolia, and may be one of the earliest jade dragons in China.  Among the exhibited items, I find especially striking a bronze dagger made 4,000 years ago.  We tend to think of bronze culture as exclusively Chinese, and it is astonishing to realize that similar progress had developed almost simultaneously in the grassland, so remote from the core of China.
 The displayed artifacts date long before the Mongol Empire (i.e., Yuan Dynasty) of the 13th -14th century. The people in this area may bear different tribe names throughout history, but they all had similar language and culture, and were similar, if not identical, in race.    
 The powerful grassland empire of the Hsiung-nu (匈奴) was just as ancient and strong as the famed Chinese Han Dynasty and this as far back in time as centuries before Christ.  Its territory, although bound on its southern reaches by the Great Wall of China, at one time surpassed in extension that of China proper, as it extended east to the Pacific Ocean, north to include Siberia, and west into Central Asia.  And it is particularly significant that long before the time of the Hsiung-nu Empire, during the historical period known as the Zhou dynasty (1120-249 B.C.), the northern tribes were already strong enough for the Chinese people to conclude that the better part of prudence was to build the Great Wall to keep them out. 
 Impressive as it is, the Great Wall did little to prevent invasion from northern assailants. Some of these tribes managed to smash a gap in the Wall and settled in China during the late Jin (晋) Dynasty (4th century A.D.).  They were able to found their own dynasties during a period spanning the 4th through the 6th century, a historical era referred to as the Southern and Northern Dynasties (南北朝 439-589).  However, as happened more than once, in the end, the Han Chinese established their supremacy.  The defeat of the Hsiung-nu during Han dynasty may have been a historical determinant of their migration westward and the establishment of the mighty Hun Empire centuries later.
 That the epithet of “barbarian” is always a relative term, and that throughout history it has been applied by the victors to the subjugated, is attested by the brilliant artistic achievement of these northern tribes.  Surely, their artistic production is far from being the rude output of “barbarians.”  Among these works are the many gigantic stone statues of Buddha and the splendid, colorful murals that may be seen in the grottoes of Datong (大同), Dunhuang (敦煌), and other sites in the northern and northwestern provinces of China
 Various small gold and silver decorative artifacts of the earlier grassland inhabitants are on display in the museum.  Unfortunately, historical relics from the Yuan dynasty (1271-1368), that is, the Mongol dynasty of China, were scarce, to say the least.  One wonders if most of the precious artifacts from China’s Mongol (Yuan) dynasty are now in the Taipei Palace Museum, in Taiwan.  During the communist revolution, as is well known, an enormous quantity of artistic treasures was removed from the mainland by the fleeing nationalist forces, and taken with them to their refuge in Taiwan.  One of the most priced possessions of the Huhhot Museum collection is a beautiful gold crown with an eagle made of semiprecious stones, which used to belong to one of the Hsiung-nu kings (Fig. 3).  Unfortunately, objects of this high value on display were rare.
 
Fig. 3.  The golden crown of a Hsiung-nu king (photo by Dr. Margaret Lin).
           
 A display that attracts our attention consists of models of tents used by Mongolian people in various regions.  The most commonly used, indistinctly called “yurt” (a Turkic word) or “ger” (in Mongolian), is round with a cone-shaped roof and made of white felt.  (White and blue, the colors of the sky, are the favorite colors of the Mongols).  The ger exhibited here is a modest one, approximately 3 to 4 meters in diameter and 2 to 2.5 meters high; it is provided with a roof-top that may be opened or closed and a wooden door.  This dwelling probably represents the kind used by common herdsmen (Fig. 4a and b).  Gers are easy to assemble, disassemble, and move around, thus being most suitable for nomadic life.   The ancient Mongols, without any knowledge of physics, built yurts incredibly resistant to the powerful wind of the grassland.  They are also water impermeable: neither torrential rain nor heavy snow can penetrate inside.  With wetting, as by rain or snow, the roof’s weight can increase to hundreds of pounds, yet a roof collapse has never been reported, even in the heaviest of rains or snow storms.  The ger also keeps the warmth within during the deep freezing Mongolian winter (fire is usually lighted inside the ger during the cold season), and the white color of the walls reflects the light and heat in the summer.  Although windowless, both the roof top and the wall can be opened by removing the felt, thereby letting the breeze in during the hot weather. 

Fig. 4a.  A ger in the museum.                                          
4b: Interior of ger (right).

 Unfortunately, there was no replica of an “ordo” in the museum, the huge tent used by Mongol nobles of ancient times.  We can only imagine the vast size and richness of the royal tents from various historical descriptions.  Friar Giovanni Di Plano Carpini (ca. 1180 - 1252), an envoy of Pope Gregory IX, wrote in his report of his journey to the Mongol court from 1245 to 1247: 
Cuyuc (Guyuk) 2 sent us to his mother where a court was solemnly held, and when we had arrived there, so great was the size of the tent which was made of white fabric, that we reckon that it could hold more than two thousand men. 3 

Approximately ten years later, another westerner, Friar William of Rubruck4  wrote in his famous Itinerary, the report to king Louis IX: 
They made the tent so large, that it reaches 30 feet wide.  Once I measured the wheel tracks of a cart, and found that the distance between the two wheels was 20 feet.  When the tent is placed on the cart, it will extend outside the cart about 5 feet on each side.  Once I counted 22 oxen which pulled a cart….”.

A chariot so large that it can transport a 30 feet-wide tent, and is pulled by 22 oxen!  This description, if truthful, fills us with genuine admiration and wonder (Fig. 5).  We cannot help but doubt the veracity of the report, although perhaps this manner of transport was possible in vast stretches of flat grassland.  In past times, the Scottish orientalist, Henry Yule, went as far as to try to illustrate what Rubruck was describing. 5 Experts who have studied in detail the role of animal traction in human industry abstain from commenting on this remarkable description, 6 but note that in Europe, during the construction of great cathedrals, enormous boulders were transported by traction of many oxen or mules.  No definite affirmation may be made on whether the transportation of enormous yurts was actually practiced as reported by Rubruk.

Fig. 5.  A larger ger (ordo) on the move

Friar Capini also witnessed the enthronement of the Grand Khan Guyuk in a magnificent ceremonial tent erected for this occasion, and adds other descriptive details:
… The tent [where Guyuk was to be enthroned] was supported by columns which were covered with gold leaf affixed with golden nails and other woods, and the ceiling above and the interior of the walls were made of a silken fabric though the exterior was of woolen cloth. …..
… The throne was entirely of ebony and wonderfully carved.  There were gold and precious stones and, if we remember rightly, pearls, and it was mounted by steps and was rounded at the back”. 7
         
 The door of a ger, usually a square frame made of wood and covered with felt, always faces southeast.  Inside the ger, there are strict rules for placing objects and sitting locations.  Men sit on the west side and women the east.  Friar Capini, when visiting the ordo of Batu (拔都),8 Khan of the Golden Horde, recorded the following:9
Indeed, he (Batu) sits in the highest place, as on a throne, with one of his wives.  All others, however, whether brothers or sons, and other nobles, sit below in the middle on a bench.  The other men sit beyond them on the ground, with the men on the right and the women on the left.  He has great and beautiful tents of linen which belonged to the King of Hungary. 10

 White, round gers clustered in the open prairie of the grassland are a common sight.  Here, no walls, no enclosures, no yards, and no gardens exist around a house.  Legend says that Genghis Khan’s courtiers proposed to him to build a large palace and a beautiful, enclosed garden, after he had established his empire.  Genghis Khan refused.  His answer was: “I don’t need a large palace and a beautiful garden.  If I don’t break the sacred skin of the golden earth, and if I don’t change the natural visage of the grassland, this one will be my garden.  There is no need to build one”. 
 A ger’s door is without a lock.  Under Genghis Khan, robbery, theft, and adultery were all punishable by death11 regardless of the offender’s rank; in the case of adultery, both the man and the woman would be executed.  However, one author states that the ancient Mongols defined adultery in a way that differed from that most generally accepted in the world, since they exempted from this designation the sexual relations between a woman and the close relatives of her husband, or between a man and female servants or the wives of other men in his household. 12
 Carpini might have exaggerated somewhat when describing the severity of Mongolian laws.  The Great Yassa (Jassaq), Genghis Khan’s law, stipulated that a horse thief was to be executed if he could not pay a steep fine.  This, of course, was due to the great importance of horses in a Mongol’s livelihood.   Interestingly, the homicide did not have to pay for his crime with his life, but was obligated to pay a pricey compensation.13  Yet, this does not mean that the deceased man’s life was deemed valueless; rather, the intent was to emphasize that the life of the living man was of paramount importance.  In this militaristic society, under the constant threat of armed conflict, a man would be far more useful alive than dead.  The Mongol population has always been low, so that in war all men between the ages of 15 and 70 were drafted into the army.
********************************
 All along, our museum guide, a young girl dressed in traditional Mongolian garb, has been reciting, apparently by rote, what sounds like an official speech extolling the social benefits that Mongolia has derived from a communist government.  Here, the rocks displayed are pretexts to praise the advances in mining exploitation; there, maps and charts point out the progress that the government has achieved in other fields.  Somehow, harangues speeches of this kind never seem to catch my undivided attention.  On this occasion, while the guide recites her encomium of the political system, my eye is caught by some very pretty garments displayed in a window.  Here the city of Huhhot puts on a fine show of the folk customs and elaborate attires typical of the various Mongol tribes.
 The ordinary men’s apparel varies little from tribe to tribe. It consists of a loose, long robe with a long, wide, brightly colored, leathern or silk belt hung with various objects of practical daily use, such as snuffbox, flints (usually decorated with intricate silver carvings and semiprecious jewels), smoking instruments, and the uniquely styled, small Mongolian knives with chopsticks (Fig. 6).  The belt is worn low, to protect the waist and lower back during long hours of riding.  The Mongolian boots look different from those usually seen in Western countries; they are made of leather, but are slightly incurved at the toes, although not so much as the medieval Arabian footwear. The boots may have embossed Mongolian designs composed of complicated squares or circles (Fig. 7). 
   
 
Fig. 6. Man’s costume and knife with chopsticks.                       

Fig. 7.  Mongolian boots.

The grandees’ apparel of the past must have impressed visitors as a striking example of colorful, barbarian extravagance, but not much of it remains.  Very few paintings are extant that show the costumes used at the peak of the Mongolian Empire’s glory.  We can only imagine them from the chroniclers’ descriptions.  In the early years of the empire, affairs of state were usually held in huge, magnificent tents, and were accompanied by feasts lasting many days. The most famous was the feast of Jisun (“color,” in Mongolian) or Jama (“garment,” in Persian).  During this extended celebration, the grassland was crowded with Mongol princes and foreign dignitaries and ambassadors. 14 All the Mongol nobles were required to wear a specified color for each day.  Wrote Friar Carpini:
….  On the first day everyone dressed in purple coats and on the second in red, and then when Cuyuc came to the tent on the third day, everyone dressed in blue and on the fourth day in their best silk. 15

A ceremony of great solemnity was the Khuriltai (council) meeting to elect the Grand Khan. A 13th century Persian chronicler, Juvaini, 16 witnessed the election of the Grand Khan Ogodai 17 in 1229, and wrote that during a period of forty days the attendees donned each day new clothes of different color and drank abundant wine, at the same time discussing the affairs of the kingdom.   
The raiment of the nobles underwent marked elaboration during the Yuan dynasty.  However, unlike Chinese emperors and nobles, who were usually dressed in elaborately embroidered costumes, the Mongol noblemen preferred robes of a single color. Marco Polo described the festival for Khubilai Khan’s (忽必烈) 18 birthdays:
Now, on his birthday, the Great Kaan [Khan] dresses in the best of his robes, all wrought with beaten gold; and full 12,000 Barons and Knights on that day come forth dressed in robes of the same colour, and precisely like those of the Great Kaan, except that they are not so costly; but still they are all of the same colour as his, and are also of silk and gold.  Every man so clothed has also a girdle of gold; and this as well as the dress is given him by the Sovereign.  And I will aver that there are some of these suits decked with so many pearls and precious stones that a single suit shall be worth full 10,000 golden bezants.
And of such raiment there are several sets. For you must know that the Great Kaan, thirteen times in the year, presents to his Barons and Knights such suits of raiment as I am speaking of.  And on each occasion they wear the same colour that he does, a different colour being assigned to each festival. 19

We don’t know what colors were used for various occasions except that gold was used for the Khan’s birthday, and, according to Marco Polo’s narrative, white was favored for New Year’s day, on the belief that white clothing is lucky.  
The symbolic significance of clothes to Mongols is demonstrated in Marco Polo’s report that the ruler, when he wished to honor his subjects, bestowed clothes upon them as gifts:
Now you must know that the Great Kaasn hath set apart 12,000 of his men who are distinguished by the name of ‘Keshican’ [royal guard – an honored position], as I have told you before; and on each of these 12,000 Barons he bestows thirteen changes of raiment, which are all different from one another: I mean that in one set the 12,000 of one colour; the next 12,000 of another colour, and so on; so that they are of thirteen different colours.  These robes are garnished with gems and pearls and other precious things in a very rich and costly manner.  And along with each of these changes of raiment, i.e., 13 times in the year, he bestows on each of these 12,000 Barons a fine golden girdle of great richness and value, and likewise a pair of boots of ‘Camut’ [*leather made from the back skin of a camel], that is to say of ‘Borgal’ [*Russian leather], curiously wrought with silver thread; insomuch that when they are clothed in these dresses every man of them looks like a king!” 20

Mongol men pay special attention to the hat; not its style, but its symbolic meaning.  It is a sign of dignity, and in the past it was also a class symbol.  The chronicles pointedly note that when Genghis Khan punished his younger brother Khasar, he first took away his hat and belt. 21  Upon the death of a Khan or king, the ceremonial dictated that his subjects remove all decorative objects from their hats.  Hats were also removed when the noblemen swore allegiance to the new Khan.  Juvaini, described the ceremony in these terms:
 “In accordance with their ancient custom they [the nobles] removed their hats and slung their belts across their backs; and it being the year 1228-9 Chagatai [Ogodai’s older brother] took his [Ogodai’s] right hand and Otegin his left, and by the resolution of aged counsel and the support of youthful fortune, established him upon the throne. Ulugh-Noyan took a cup, and all present in and outside the Court thrice knelt down and uttered prayers, saying ‘May the kingdom prosper by his being Khan!’”. 22 

There was a unique type of ancient Mongol hat that is illustrated in a famous oriental painting.  Visitors to the Taipei Palace Museum of Taiwan are always impressed by the portrait of Khubilai Khan’s wife, Empress Chabi, which is kept there.  It seems as if this lady were carrying a tall, flared-mouth vase on top of her head.  In effect, Chabi appears wearing a strikingly tall, vase-like hat called boghta or boghtaq (Fig. 8).  The materials used and the manner of its construction were described in detail by Carpini:
They [the women] wear a round thing made of basketry or bark on the head, which stands up a foot and a half, and at the top spreads into four. From the base to the top it grows wider, and at the top it has a long a graceful wand of gold, silver, wood or even feathers and it is sewed onto a cap which drapes down to the shoulders.  And this cap, just like the outfit already described, is made either of buckram, felt or silk. 23 
          

Fig. 8.  Portrait of Empress Chabi, wife of Khubilai.    (Original in National Palace Museum, Taipei, Taiwan).

Fig. 9. Enthronement scene.  Redrawn from an early 14th century illustration (detail). Original kept in the City Library of Berlin.


This striking fashion was obviously popular in the Yuan (Mongol) court in the 13th and 14th centuries. That it was used throughout the empire is attested by its depiction in a 14th century Persian painting (Fig. 9).  Unfortunately for lovers of colorful haute couture, this highly original headgear seems to have totally disappeared, leaving no trace in the Mongolian wardrobe. 
In ancient times, customs dictated that a hostess should wear her hat or headdress when receiving guests.  Elaborate headgear is uncommonly seen today.  Most women simply wear a scarf around their hair in the summer and a warm hat in wintertime.  Complex headdresses, reserved for important occasions, are of extraordinary richness and regional variety (Fig. 10).  The women of Ordos may be said to don the most intricate and laborious headdress, with many strings of semiprecious stones hanging on the side and back (Fig. 11).  The large headdresses of barhu and Khalkha Mongols, probably harking back to some ancient fashion, we found especially impressive, due to a unique style that looks like ox horns upside down (Fig. 12a).  This singular style passes for having inspired the hairdo of Queen Amidala, a personage in the immensely popular 1999 film, Star Wars, Episode 1 (Fig. 12b).  Regardless of the style, the headdress of Mongolian women is usually made of silver (gold for the wealthy) and heavily decorated with corals, agates, turquoises, pearls, and jades.
Fig. 10. Headdresses and costumes of women of various Mongol tribes shown in the museum.


Fig. 11. Headdress of Ordos women.  


Fig. 11b.  A young woman in traditional Ordos headdress.

Fig. 12a.  An old photograph of a Khalkha Mongol noblewoman. (photograph taken by Arthur de Carle Sowerby.  In:  Mongolia, Nomad descendants of the Golden horde.  The Amalgamated Press (1922) Ltd., London, 1923.  The article appeared in “Peoples of All Nations” magazine.) 

Fig. 12b.  Queen Amidala in the movie “Star War, Episode 1”. 

 In contrast to married women, single young women’s apparel is surprisingly simple and, except for the earrings, not too different from the men’sThis custom also seems to date from the thirteenth century, as noted by a chronicler’s remark: “Maidens and other young women can be told from men only with great difficulty because they are dressed like the men.”  24 The fancy headdress belongs only to adult married women.
 We leave the museum feeling deeply intrigued by the uniqueness of some features of the culture on display here.  How was nomadic life for men, women, and children?  It is astonishing that Mongol women should have developed such intricate, convoluted adornments in the midst of an existence marked by deprivation and war alarms, and in a fierce climate of extreme temperatures.  Clearly, their lives left little place for hedonist self-indulgence.  Women drove the carts, placed the movable dwellings on and off the carts, milked the cows, made butter and other milk-derived products, and produced thread out of strong tendons of killed animals.  This thread they used to saw skins, boots, and clothing.  They made felt for their tents, or to wrap themselves with, and they looked after the sheep and goats in alternation with the men. They cooked and prepared the animal skins.  They had the babies under precarious conditions (never lying down during delivery, as chroniclers tell us), raised them, and were generally were in charge of the organization of domestic life.  
 Will the ancient ways of the grassland culture die out?  In Inner Mongolia they seem to us gravely threatened.  The Mongol ethnic population here is greatly outnumbered by the Han Chinese, in a proportion of approximately seven to one.  An American journalist commented with humor that finding a true ethnic Mongolian in Inner Mongolia “is like searching for a Sioux Indian in Sioux City.”  25 Not quite: ethnic Mongolians, although outnumbered, still constitute in this part of China a population of about three million.  Yet it is true that the living source of their traditions is being inexorably sapped.  A large part of the prairie that sustained their way of life is now bulldozed, giving way to buildings and factories.  Their religion is no longer actively suppressed by a communist government, but it is far from being fostered: priests are elderly, replaced only at their death, and must come from elsewhere, since local conditions do not induce the young to take up a religious calling.  And young people must look for jobs utterly alien to pastoral or nomadic life if they are going to survive.
 It is an inescapable law of life that those who fail to adjust to changing conditions must perish. My own father left the grassland to pursue a high education, first in a high school in Naking and later in the university 西南联大.  He never returned to his homeland.  Many Mongols did the same.  We don’t know how the Mongols will fare under the present challenging conditions.  But the Mongol people are indomitable, intense, and vigorous; such a race, I believe, shall find a foothold in the modern world, and will contribute to the common welfare of humanity with its endurance and resilience, just as it once shook humanity with the terror of its ferocity and irresistible might.  

(This article has been edited by F. G. Crussi.)
****************************************


NOTES:

1.                  Artur de Gobineau:  Essai sur l’inegalité des races humaines.  Book 3, chapter V.  In: Oeuvres. Vol. 1 Gallimard. Collection Pléiade. Paris, 1983, pp 596-597.
2.                  The Grand Khan Guyuk (古余克 or 贵由 ruled 1246-1248) was the son of Ogodai (窝阔台) and grandson of Genghis Khan.  Friar Carpini described him as a man “40 or 45 years old or more, of medium height, very wise and extremely clever and very serious, and strict in his morals, so that no one ever easily sees him laugh or make a joke”. Carpini: Story of the Mongols, p. 114
3.                  Ibid., p. 107.
4.                  Friar William of Rubruck, born in French Flanders, was sent by King Louis IX of France (St. Louis) to Mongolia (1253-55).  He met the Grand Khan Mongke (蒙哥), son of Tolui (托雷)and grandson of Genghis Khan. Although sent by the French king, Friar William was not an official envoy.  He was more interested in missionary work.   When the Franciscan friar threatened the Khan with hellfire if he did not convert to Catholicism, Mongke is reported to have replied: “The nurse at first lets some drops of milk into the infant’s suck; only then does she offer him her breast.  In the same way you should persuade Us, who seem to be totally unacquainted with this doctrine, in a simple and rational manner.  Instead you immediately threaten Us with eternal punishments.”   Friar William was asked to join a public debate with Moslems and Buddhists, and did so before his return to France. (I. de Rachewiltz.  “Papal Envoys to the Great Khans”.  Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA, 1971. pp. 137-8.  Henceforward referred to as Papal Envoys.)
5.                  Henry Yule: The Book of Ser Marco Polo the Venetian.  (In 2 vols.).  Paris.  Henri Cordier. 1903. Vol. 1, engraving on page 247.  This author was awarded a gold medal by the British Geographical Society because of his explorations in Asia.  He made interesting researches on the Mongols in his book Cathay and the Way Thither. Hakluyt Society, London. 1866.
6.                  See the works of Commandant Richard Lefebvre des Noettes:  La Force Motrice Animale à Travers les AgesParis, Berger-Levrault. 1924; and L’Attelage et le Cheval de Selle à Travers les Ages.  Paris, Picard. 1939.
7.                  Carpini: Story of the Mongols. p. 109 and 111.
8.                  Batu (拔都), son of Jochi and grandson of Genghis Khan, was the founder of the Kipchak Khanate (钦察汗国, Golden Horde), and the leader of the European campaign.  Friar Capini described him thus: “When he [Batu] rides, a canopy or little tent is carried over his head on a spear point, and most of the great princes of the Tartars do this and so do their wives.  This Bati (Batu) is very good to his people, yet they fear him greatly.  He is most savage in battle and very wise and most clever in war because he has fought so much”.  Ibid., p. 102.
9.                  Ibid., p. 101.
10.              The reference is to King Bela IV of Hungary, who was defeated by Batu in 1241.
11.              Carpini: Story of the Mongols, p. 53.
12.              Weatherford:  Genghis Khan and the Making of the Modern World, p. 68.
13.              Li Dong-fang. (黎東方): Yuan Dynasty (細說元朝), chapter 21, p. 193.
14.              Friar Caprini wrote:  “Outside there were Duke Ierozlal of Russian Suzdal, and many Kytai and Solangi dukes, and two of the sons of the King of Georgia, the ambassador of the Caliph of Baghdad who was a sultan, and more than ten other Saracen sultans, which we believe and which was told us by officials. Indeed, there were more than four thousand ambassadors among them who brought tribute and gifts, and sultans and other dukes who came to submit as well as those whom the Tartars had sent for and those who are governors of territories.”  Carpini:  Story of the Mongols, p. 108. 
15.              Ibid., p. 107.
16.              Ala-ad-Din Ata-Malik Juvaini (1226 – 1283), Persian historian and a high official of the Mongol Empire, began writing his history of the Mongols (The Story of the World Conqueror) when he visited the Mongol capital, Karakorum, in 1252-1253.  He was with Ilkhan Hulagu, Khubilai’s younger brother, during the conquests of Almut and Baghdad (1258), and was subsequently appointed the governor of Baghdad, Lower Mesoptamia and Khuzistan.  Juvani attended a Khuriltai around 1282, a year before his death.
17.              Although Ogodai (窝阔台) was the designated heir by Genghis Khan, a Khuriltai was still held for his election.  According to Juvaini: “. …. all the princes with an unanimity unmingled with evil or strife said to Ogetei (Ogodai): ‘In accordance with the command of Chingiz-Khan it behooves thee with divine assistance to set thy foot upon the hand of kingship in order that all the mighty ones may with one accord gird the loins of their lives with the girdle of submission and servitude and incline their eyes and ears to obeying thy command.” The Mongol custom was to name the youngest son as heir.  Thus they debated for 40 days while they feasted and wined, in different clothes everyday.   Juvaini: World Conqueror. Vol. 1, pp. 185-6.
18.              Marco Polo wrote of Khubilai (忽必烈): “He is of a good stature, neither tall nor short, but of a middle height.  He has a becoming amount of flesh, and is very shapely in all his limbs.  His complexion is white and red, the eyes black and fine, the nose well formed and well set on.”  Travels of Marco Polo: Vol. 1, pp. 185-6 and  356.
19.              Ibid., pp 386-7.
20.              Ibid., p. 394.
21.              Ardajab: Secret History, p. 446.
22.              Juvaini tells us that “after much importunity on their part and much refusing on the part of Ogetei, he obeyed the command of his father and followed the advice of his brothers and uncles ”  accepting the name of  Qa’an (Grand Khan).  Upon which, all the princes  “knelt three times to the sun ouside the ordu; then re-entering they held an assembly of mirth and sport and cleared the plains of merriment of the thorns of sorrow”. Juvaini: World Conqueror, p. 187.
23.              Carpini:  Story of the Mongols, p. 40.
24.              Ibid: Story of the Mongols, p. 41.
25.              Michael Kohn:  Dateline Mongolia.  An American Journalist in Nomad’s Land.  RDR Books, Muskegon, Michigan. 2006.  page 247.  Henceforward referred to as Kohn: Dateline Mongolia.






Monday, September 30, 2013

Travelogue to France

2013 Trip to France


Pilgrims are people in motion, passing through territories not their own, seeking something we might call completions, or perhaps the word clarity will do as well, a goal to which only the spirit’s compass points the way.” (<Pilgrims and Pioneers> by Richard Niebuhr (1894-1962).

Bordeaux

Our journey begins in Bordeaux, the capital of the Aquitaine region.  The historic part of the city is on the UNESCO World Heritage List as "an outstanding urban and architectural ensemble" of the 18th century.
Bordeaux was the capital of Aquitaine as early as during Roman rule.  When Roman power declined, it was repeatedly ravaged by barbarians: the Vandals (3rd century), the Visigoths (5th century),  Abd er Rahman  (8th century) and the Vikings (9th century).  In the Middle Ages, Aquitaine had pledged allegiance formally to the Carolingian dynasty, but it remained out of Frankish central rule.

From the 12th to the 15th century, Bordeaux became an important city following the marriage of Eleanor of Aquitaine (ruling duchess) with Count of Anjou, Henri Plantagenet, who became, within months of their wedding, King Henry II of England. The city flourished, primarily due to wine trade. It was also the capital of an independent  state under the Black Prince (English), during the 100-Year War.  After the Battle of Castillon (1453) which ended the war, it was annexed by France (by Charles VII of France).
In the 17th century, Bordeaux adhered to the Fronde, being effectively annexed to the Kingdom of France only after the army of Louis XIV entered the city in 1653.

The 18th century saw the golden age of Bordeaux. Many downtown buildings (about 5,000) are from this period. Victor Hugo found the town so beautiful he once said: "take Versailles, add Antwerp, and you have Bordeaux". Baron Haussmann, a long-time prefect of Bordeaux, used Bordeaux's 18th-century big-scale rebuilding as a model when he was asked by Emperor Napoleon III to transform a then still quasi-medieval Paris into a "modern" capital that would make France proud.  [Anyone remembers the difference between Louis XV and Louis XVI styles?]

The Grand Theatre is a classic style building with 9 Muses and 3 additional goddesses on the roof.  Of the latter, I could recognize one being Athena.  I assume the other 2 are Hera and Aphrodite.
Montaigne was once the mayor of Bordeaux.  Goya (who had a statue in a plaza outside the church) spent his last years and died in Bordeaux.  Montesquieu’s name was mentioned by the guide, but I believe he lived in a chateau nearby, but not in the city of Bordeaux.


              

St. Emilion:

Saint-Émilion, a World Heritage site, was named after the hermit monk Émilion, who settled in a hermitage carved into the rock there in the 8th century. It was the monks who followed him that started up the commercial wine production in the area.  The guide told us the miracle stories of St. Emilion.  He worked for the Count of Vannes, and often took advantage of his position to steal food to give to the poor.  Once he was caught in the act, but when he opened his cloak, all food turned into dead wood.  He later travelled south, performed another miracle somewhere (taking out bread from the heated oven with his hands), and settled down in a stone cave here, where he lived for 17 (?) years until his death.  We visited his hermitage, which has a “chair” carved into the rock wall.  The guide told us that the chair has miraculous power to help barren women, and all they have to do is to sit on the chair, and they will get pregnant after returning home.  Frank remembers that there’s an image of the Virgin of Guadalupe painted on the wall above the chair’s seat. There is also a spring within the cave.  Above the hermitage there’s a beautiful Holy Trinity chapel with Gothic vaulting.

Next to the hermitage is the famous monolithic church, the largest of its kind in Europe.  The construction began in the 12th (?) century after Crusaders ‘ return and finished in the 14th (?) century.  The church is impressive, having 3 tall aisles separated by 2 rows of huge pillars.  Above the main altar, there’s a strange carving showing a man thrusting a stick (spear?) into the throat of a dragon.  On his right side there’s another man playing violin.  A chalice is in the center. There are several interpretations of the carving, but none certain.  On the high wall on one side, there’s a painting of a seraphim (with 6 wings). 
     
Monolithic church

  
Franciscan monastery

The "Great Wall" (Dominican) outside the town
          
The adjacent catacombs house the bodies of St. Emilion’s followers and descendants.  The unusual part is the high dome with an opening on the top.

On top of the monolithic church, there’s a tall bell tower which dominates the landscape of the town. It’s over 50 m high and very heavy (how many tons? I forgot), threatening the church beneath.  Special constructions have been made to support the tower.

There’s also a large, Romanesque style, collegiate Church (12-14th c) with a beautiful cloister.  Another surprise beauty is the Franciscan monastery, now in ruins.  Also in ruins is the cardinal’s palace; only one wall remains.  Just outside the village, there’s another rather well preserved tall wall with openings (windows), which used to be a Dominican monastery before it was demolished.

The town is hilly.  Our pretty guide told us that in medieval times, the wealthy lived in the upper town, and the poor in the lower town.  I’m not sure where the beautiful market place belongs. It seems to be in the middle level. It’s quite relaxing to sit at the outdoor café in the market place for lunch or deserts.

“The King’s tower” is the keep of the once Romanesque style fortress.  It has served as the town hall for the “Jurade” (town council).  The establishment of this secular power was granted in the 12th century by King John of England, who’s also the Duke of Aquitaine.  It survived 4 centuries of wars; first, the 100 Years war, then the Religious War. (St. Emilion was Catholic).  It finally ended when Henry of Navarre succeeded Henry III to be the king of France, and became Henry IV.  Although he was converted to Catholic, I wonder if he really cared that much about religion.

One less known part of history:  The Girondists were from this region.  Their leader, Guadet, was born in St. Emilion.  He and his comrades fled to St. Emilion and hid in various places.  Unfortunately, all but one were captured and executed, only a few days before the end of the Reign of Terror.  The main street in St. Emilion is named after Guadet.

Lastly, we bought in St. Emilion the best macarrons we have ever tasted.

Sarlat:

Sarlat, the capital of the Perigord Noir, was the first place in France to be safeguarded under the Malraux law of 1964, classified as Ville d’Art et d’Histoire.  It’s awarded three-star classification by the Michelin Guide.

Sarlat developed around a large Benedictine abbey of Carolingian origin during Pepin the Short & Charlemagne times. The medieval Sarlat Cathedral is dedicated to St. Sacerdos (bishop of Limoges).  In 1147 Saint Bernard, passing through Sarlat on his return from the Albigensian crusade, performed-as legend has it- the miracle of the healing loaves, which was commemorated by the tower of Saint-Bernard, known as the Lantern of the Dead.  It is situated behind the apse of the cathedral, in the middle of Sarlat’s first cemetery.

St. Sacerdos Cathedral with Lantern of the dead.

The town suffered from the 100 Years War owing to its position as a frontier region between the kings of France and England. The well fortified town withstood all attacks and only became English when, by the treaty of Brétigny of 1360, Edward III of England renounced his claim to the throne of France in exchange for the South West of France.  But 10 years later, the Constable Du Guesclin chased the English from France and Sarlat became French once more.

But sadly, after the treaty of Castillon ended the 100 Years War (1453), the Wars of Religion ravaged the town again. But peaceful days came with the reign of Henry IV. The cathedral was rebuilt during this time.
Sarlat was a prosperous town throughout the 15th to 18th century, but declined later due to its remote location from the main stream.  The city was saved thanks to a law promulgated in 1962 (by Malraux) by which the old town received sufficient financial aid to undertake a program of restoration.      
There’re many good restaurants in Sarlat.  Even a tourist’s menu, less than 20 Euros, tastes good.  


The 3 Graces

Princess in the tower waiting for her knight

        

Beynac:

Before seeing the Beynac castle, we first got on a boat ride on the Dordogne River.  Dordogne was the border between the French & English in the 100 Years War.  From the boat we could see 2 more nearby castles.  Castelnaud is farther, and was an enemy town during the War. (Castelnaud was loyal to the English, whereas Beynac to the French.)  Castelnaud had a “satellite” castle, Fayrac, as its fore guard, almost facing Beynac castle, which is now the property of a rich Texan. 
Beynac (the castle is on top of the hill)

The castle

   
                                        Fayrac

The Beynac castle, on top of a near vertical cliff, was built in the 12th century by the barons of Beynac (one of the four baronies of Périgord) . The sheer cliff being sufficient to discourage any assault from that side, the defences were built up on the plateau: double crenellated walls, double moats, and double barbican.

On entering the lower courtyard, we saw a large, square-shaped, 12th century, Romanesque keep with vertical sides and few openings.  A ramp leads us to the upper courtyard where there’s a stable which was used in the movie “Joan of Arc”. 

We entered the castle through the door of the 14th century machicolated keep, probably built by the English, as the castle had been taken and occupied by Richard the Lionheart in 1189 until he was killed in 1199 near Limoges.  It changed hand to French then again to English, but finally returned to France after the 100 Years War. 

After walking up and down staircases, we reached a large medieval state hall.  This was where the nobility of the 4 baronies of Perigord used to meet.  Their flags can be seen on the walls.  Opposite to the fireplace there is a small oratory (chapel) with painted frescoes.
   
                                                          flag of Beynac                

There are several old sumptuous tapestries showing hunting and other scenes from the lives of the lords of the period. The Beynac castle has been listed as a monument historique by the French Ministry of Culture.  It has served as a location for several films, including “Les Visiteurs”, “La Fille de d'Artagnan”, and “Jeanne d'Arc” by Luc Besson, in 1999. The village of Beynac below the chateau, also served as a location for the film “Chocolat” in 2000.

Domme:

Domme is a “bastide” (a fortified medieval town), today belonging to "The Most Beautiful Villages of France".  Its history is very much like other towns in this region.  During the 100 Years' War, the town repeatedly changed rulers throughout until the end of the War. The Wars of Religion brought new turmoil. Protestants took the city in 1588 by climbing the cliffs at night to open the gates. A short success, as the Protestant captain had to hand the bastide back to the Catholics in 1592.
We took the “Domme Express” (very slow) train to go up to the town.  We only had time to visit the Templars’ prison in the guard house.

Templar's prison

In 1307, 70 Knight Templars were imprisoned in Domme during the trial, of which numerous Templar graffiti still bear witness. They used a code system involving several geometric figures: the square representing the Temple, the circle representing the prison, the octagon representing the Grail, and the triangle surmounted by a cross representing Golgotha.  Cameras are forbidden in the prison.  I searched the internet after my return, but could only find a few of the graffiti.

The prison is smaller than half a tennis court and has only 4 slit windows.  Now the roof is gone, and there’s plenty of light. But at the time of the Templars’ imprisonment, it must have been very dark inside.
Our guide told us that fingernails and teeth were used to scrape away the sandstone (with only bread and water, they suffered from scurvy, and lost teeth), although stones must also have been employed. The carvings are striking evidence of their faith – as well as the anger and despair they felt.

The first carvings are found inside the entranceway: a large cross with a triangular base, surrounded by four smaller crosses. Known as a Jerusalem or Crusader’s Cross, this emblem was adopted at the time of the First Crusade, and may have been the personal arms of Godfrey of Bouillon, first brief ruler of the Kingdom of Jerusalem. The emblem is surrounded by a circle, representing the imprisonment of the Templars.  This figure is seen repeatedly on the wall.
  
Another frequently seen symbol is crucified Christ within a square – for the Templars this square was the symbol of the Temple Of Solomon. (The Templars’ headquarters in Jerusalem was at the al-Aqsa Mosque on the south side of the Temple Mount, what they thought of as the Temple of Solomon.)  
The guide described another symbols as the Jewish menorah.  (The menorah has seven branches representing light, the seven days of Creation and, when lit, the seven planets, or the all-seeing eyes of God. However, all the menorah signs I’ve seen have an even top.  The Templar’s signs have branches of uneven length. )   

Then there’s the Grail. The guardians of the grail in Parzifal by Wolfram were called “Templeism”, a word taken by many to mean the Templars.  One interesting point is the octagonal shape -- the ‘stone’ immediately above the Grail.  The guide didn’t explain its symbolic meaning.  

There’s also a graffito (in the niche overlooking the valley) that depicts Pope Clement V as a serpent being speared by the Archangel Michael.  I missed this one, but I remember the guide mentioned 2 lines in Latin.  One closer to the entrance, saying “Clement destroys Templars”, and another one near the “alter”, saying “Templars destroys Clement”.  I wonder if this graffito is near the altar.

There are other enigmatic motifs, including a pentagram and several Suns and crescent moons,  symbolizing  protection and immortality.  For you erudites, these symbolic meanings are ascribed to the Pythagoreans and Neoplatonists. (Frank has explained these philosophical meanings to me, but I’m still not clear about them. These Greek philosophical teachings converged with the Christian iconography in the Middle Ages.)  Note that the sun & crescent moon are also present in the marks of Masons.
 
There’s also a hand carved into the wall, probably meaning the “protecting right hand of God” (in Christianity).  However, the guide said that it could also mean the hand of Fatima (“hamsa”) in Islam.  Personally, I’d think it highly unlikely.

The most elaborate graffiti are in the “altar” where pattern of lace was carved around the “table”.  Beside the images of the crucifix and the Virgin, the background was filled with innumerable little heads.  Who are those heads? The Saracens killed by the Crusaders?  Or the Templars themselves?  We will never know.
I was deeply moved by the sight.  I could almost feel the presence of those poor souls.  I felt their strong emotional contact with their creators, the mixture of their intense devotion to God, anger to the injustice they suffered, and despair.  Did they anticipate what’s awaiting them in the future?  None of the 70 Templars survived to tell the story, but those carvings make us empathetic to their suffering.


Rouffignac Cave and National Prehistorical Museum at Les Eyzies

I had great expectation for the prehistorical caves, but was disappointed by the guide’s Franglish.  I caught about 5% of his explanations.  The Great Ceiling with most of the paintings is deep inside the long and vast cave.  The animals depicted include (following the frequency) mammoth, bison, horses, ibex, rhinoceros, and others.  The artists were Homo sapiens sapiens, about 10,000 to 12,000 BC.  The choice of the location was not random, but the meaning of the paintings remains unclear. 

La Roque St Christophe

The Roque St. Christophe cliff, 300 ft above the road and the Vezere River, stretches across half a mile long.  It was first inhabited by Neanderthals (50,000 BC), but the great period of habitation is in the Middle Ages, beginning in the 10th century, for the purpose of protecting against Norman invasions. 

After passing a narrow gate with a lookout post on the top, and a dark tunnel, we entered a mini-village.  It has a church, various houses (now gone), and various medieval machinery devices (well winch, single barrel crab winch, horizontal winch, fixed scaffolding, swing crane with beam, capstan, etc.) a forge and a quarry.  The lookout system across the valley extended to more than 11 miles. A sound signal (a sentry blowing a horn) from a nearby lookout site could travel miles within 6 min.


   
Bayonne:

The city’s history goes back to Roman times.  It was later invaded by the Vikings.  By the 13th century, the city was an important port, with a Gascon population. As part of Aquitaine, it was ruled by England between 1151 to 1452 and was a key commercial center at the southern end of the English kingdom.  At the end of the 100 Years War, Bayonne was given to the French king, Charles VII. Wellington's army besieged the city in the Napoleonic Wars (1813-4), and took it by using a bridge of ships across the Adour to position artillery around the city.

Basque pirates brought back riches and Basque sailors were known for whaling and fishing.  Bayonne people were also known for shipbuilding, ironsmith work and had a well developed armaments industry, giving the world the "bayonet".  Jewish refugees from the Spanish Inquisition from 1560 brought new trades, most notably chocolate-making.

Spanish Basques also sought refuge in Bayonne in the 20th century during Franco's repression, with Petite Bayonne still a center of Basque nationalism. (The Nive divides Bayonne into Grande Bayonne and Petite Bayonne, with five bridges between the two.)

We had a wonderful Scottish-Australian guide for the Basque Museum (which used to be an orphanage).  He explained the different development of the language of the Basque and Gascon (I’ve forgotten it.)  He mentioned 2 Basque words used in English: “bizarre” and “silhouette”.   He also explained the unique structures of the Basque farmhouse and church, “croissant”-like (my own terminology) headdress for women, the strange pagan symbols on the tombstones, seafaring, bullfight, pirates, and pelota.


 Note the headdress                        

Cathedral                                                                             

The Cathédrale Sainte-Marie is an elegant Gothic building, constructed in the 12th and 13th centuries. The south tower was completed in the 16th century but the north tower in the 19th century. The cathedral is noted for its charming cloisters.

After a typical Basque lunch (with Bayonne ham, which impressed Carlo) and the museum visit, we only had time to stop by a café to taste the famous chocolate.  (An interesting note: It is said by some that Bayonne is the birthplace of mayonnaise, supposedly a corruption of Bayonnaise.)

Ainhoa, Sare, Espelette & Ortillopitz farm:

Ainhoa and Sare, are border towns on the passage by the Way of St. James (Baztan way), which goes from Bayonne to Pamplona.

Anhoa was at the border of between the Duchy of Aquitaine (run by the Angevin Kings of England) and the Navarrese kingdom in the Middle Ages.  Ainhoa paid taxes to both the King of Navarre and the "English" Seneschal of the Landes territory and charged tolls to the pilgrims.

In the Spanish Invasion of 1636 many villages, including Ainhoa, were razed. Ainhoa was repopulated after the 1659 "Treaty of the Pyrénées" between France & Spain. Ainhoa was again destroyed during the Thirty Years War (1618-1648) and then rebuilt. The only remains from before the destruction are the church and the Machitorénéa House.  We stayed at a very charming hotel and spent the most relaxing 2 nights there.
   
The church                                                              



Note the multiple levels in the church. Women on ground level


Espellet is a charming town. The local favorite seems to be red peppers.  They are hung at the window, and the walls of many houses. Unfortunately, the church was closed.  We sat down at a tiny backyard garden of a small café and had a pleasant conversation among friends before having a typical Espelette dinner flavored with the local peppers. 


The Ortillopitz farm is a 17th century farm typically Basque style.  The ground floor houses animals (horses, cows & oxen), on the 2nd level lived the old masters (grandparents), masters, and children, and the top floor was for storage of grains.  The family name was the same as the name of the house, and the house was passed down to the eldest son or daughter.  The younger siblings had to go out to earn their own houses. That’s the reason why so many Basque names are “new house”.  (It’s uncommon to see the eldest son married the eldest daughter of another family for this reason.)  The grandparents had the most comfortable seats facing the fireplace.   To me the most interesting thing in the house were 2 sticks used by the wife to call back the husband who was herding sheep or doing field work outside.  The guide said that Ravel got his inspiration from this for his famous “Bolero”.  Most of the Basque houses we’ve seen are painted red and white.  The museum guide said that the red color came from the blood of the animals, but this was not confirmed or explained by the farm guide.

St. Jean Pied de Port:

The town was the old capital of the traditional Basque province of Lower Navarre. This is also the starting point in the movie The Way (film).

The original town at a nearby place was razed to the ground in 1177 by Richard the Lionheart. The Kings of Navarre refounded the town on its present site shortly afterwards. The town was once a part of the Spanish province of Navarre.

The town was an important point on the Way of St. James, as it stands at the base of the Roncesvaux Pass across the Pyrenees. The routes from Paris, Vézelay and Le Puy-en-Velay meet at Saint-Jean-Pied-de-Port and it was the pilgrims' last stop before the arduous mountain crossing.

The cobbled rue de la Citadelle runs downhill and over the river from the 15th century Porte St-Jacques to the Porte d'Espagne by the bridge. The 14th century red Gothic church, Notre-Dame-du-Bout-du-Pont, stands by the Porte d'Espagne. The original was built by Sancho the Strong of Navarre to commemorate the 1212 Battle of Las Navas de Tolosa where Moorish dominance of Spain was undermined.  Above the town at the top of the hill is the citadel, remodelled by Vauban in the 17th century.
   
Church Notre Dame           



  Statue on the other side of the porte
Citadelle
                               

Hondarribia, Spain

Hondarribia (Spanish name Fuenterrabia), the border town holds an ancient old quarter with walls and a castle belonging to the Holy Roman Emperor, Charles V (now a parador).   Next to the castle is an ancient church, which was, unfortunately, closed.

                                            Charles V's castle


In 1638, the invasion force of Louis XIII besieged Fuenterrabía for two months, leaving only 300 survivors. The city was virtually destroyed, but nevertheless did not surrender.  Spain eventually raised the siege, which is celebrated annually on September 8.

[Frank remembers a story about the Du Guesclin (the French Constable who drove out English from Aquitaine) in a battle at Fuenterrabia, but he can’t remember the detail.  I only remember that the Black Prince died (probably of dysentery) soon after he withdrew from the Spanish campaign.  The Black Prince and Du Guesclin were on the opposite sides aiding the 2 half brothers who fought over the Castile throne.]

St. Jean de Luz

Saint-Jean-de-Luz is located on the Atlantic coast of France, just a few kilometres from the border with Spain.  It is known for its royal wedding connection.  Cardinal Mazarin & the French queen (regent), Ann of Austria (who was a Spaniard) set up an advantageous peace treaty (Treaty of the Pyrénées-Atlantiques), which included the marriage of Louis XIV to Maria Theresa, the Infanta of Spain.  The wedding took place in Saint-Jean-de-Luz in 1660.
The church

The church was, unfortunately, closed.  We rested on a bench in front of the “Maison Louis XIV”.  This is the house where Louis XIV, the Queen Mother and the Infanta stayed.  The house was built in 1643 by Joannis de Lohobiague, a rich ship owner.  Next to it is the Mayor’s hall.  It’s said it was built to obstruct the view of the Maison Louis XIV, as a revenge, because the owner of the latter at that time was a beautiful young widow who rejected the mayor’s advances.

Maison Louis XIV                                                   


San Sebastian

Simply beautiful!


Notes:

1              The marriage of Eleanor of Aquitaine & Henry II:

Eleanor of Aquitaine (1122 or 1124 – 1204) became Duchess of Aquitaine in her own right while she was still a child. Three months after she inherited her father’s duchy (1137), she married King Louis VII of France.  She went with Louis to the unsuccessful 2nd Crusade, and soon after her return, she sought an annulment of her marriage (she complained to others that Louis was like a monk), but her request was rejected by Pope Eugene III.  However, after the birth of her second daughter, Louis agreed to an annulment in consideration of her failure to bear a son after 15 years of marriage. The marriage was annulled in 1152 on the grounds of consanguinity within the fourth degree. Their daughters were declared legitimate and custody was awarded to Louis, while Eleanor's lands were restored to her.

As soon as the annulment was granted, Eleanor became engaged to Henry Plantagenet, Duke of Normandy & Count of Anjou, who became King Henry II of England in 1154. (Henry was the son of Geoffrey, Count of Anjou, and Matilda, the only heir of Henry I, King of England and Duke of Normandy, and granddaughter of William the Conqueror.)  Henry was her cousin of the third degree, and 9 years younger. The couple married in Poitiers in 1152, eight weeks after the annulment of Eleanor's first marriage. Over the next thirteen years, she bore Henry 8 children: 5 sons, William, Henry, Richard, Geoffrey, John, and 3 daughters.  Despite Henry’s infidelity, the marriage was a harmonious one at first.  Eleanor often acted as regent in Henry’s absence.

However, Henry and Eleanor eventually became estranged. Henry imprisoned her in 1173 for supporting her son Henry III’s revolt against the father. Eleanor’s favorite son was Richard, while Henry’s was John.  Some say that Henry II died of broken heart when he found John’s name in the list of rebels.  After Henry II’s death in 1189, the new King Richard I (the Lionheart) immediately released his mother. Now queen dowager, Eleanor acted as regent while Richard went on the Third Crusade. Eleanor survived Richard and lived well into the reign of her youngest son King John.

Eleanor was a patroness of literature.  “Courtly love” was said to have developed during her stay in Poitiers between 1168 and 1173.

2.            The 100 Years War.

The 100 Years' War was a series of battles waged from 1337 to 1453 between England and France for control of the French throne. The root cause was a dynastic disagreement dating back to the time of William the Conqueror, who became King of England in 1066 while still being the Duke of Normandy.  (Note:  King John lost Normandy to Philip II of France.) The marriage of Eleanor of Aquitaine and Henry II of England further added Aquitaine to England. As the rulers of lands on the continent, the English kings owed feudal homage to the king of France. In 1337, Edward III of England refused to pay homage to Philip VI of France, leading the French king to claim confiscation of Edward's lands in Aquitaine.

Edward responded by declaring that he, not Philip, was the rightful king of France, a claim dating to 1328, when French king Charles IV, son of Philip IV,  died without a male heir. English custom dictated that the throne should be passed on to Edward’s mother, Isabella of France, sister of Charles IV, or her descendant. But instead, Charles’s cousin, Philip VI of Valois (who’s Philip IV's nephew), was crowned king of France in accordance with the Salic Law. (The Salic Law disqualified female succession and the succession of males descended through female lines).

The war is commonly divided into three phases separated by truces: the Edwardian Era War (1337–1360), the Caroline War (1369–1389) and the Lancastrian War (1415–1453), which saw the slow decline of English fortunes after the appearance of Joan of Arc in 1429.

The famous Rodin sculpture “The burghers of Calais” depicts the event after Edward III took Calais.  He consented to spare the Calais people if 6 rich burghers offered themselves to be executed.  The 6 volunteers were eventually spared by the intervention of the English queen. 

A 9 year peace followed the Treaty of Brétigny in 1360.  Before the war, Edward’s territory in the south of France was reduced to only Gascony, and with his victory (thanks to the English long bow) and the capture of King John II of France, he was able to expand his lands in Aquitaine (to almost 1/3 of the French territory).  In exchange, Edward renounced Normandy, Touraine, Anjou and Maine and abandoned his claim to the French throne.  Edward also consented to reducing King John's ransom by a million crowns, but this amount was still beyond the French capability.  King John eventually died in England.  However, after his death, the new French king, Charles V (“the Victorious”) launched a counterattack, and recovered most of the lost land.  The aging Edward III, senile and sick, did not react to the aggression.

After both Edward III and his son, the Black Prince, died, the throne was passed to the child king Richard II.  England was plagued by internal strifes; first the peasant revolt, then the clash between the king and his cousin Henry Bolingbroke (See Shakespeare’s “Richard II”.)  The French king Charles took this opportunity to drive out most of the English except in Calais.  His successor, Charles VI (the mad king), like Richard II, was not interested in warfare, so a peace treaty was signed between the 2 countries.

In England, the unpopular Richard II was defeated by the usurper, his cousin, Henry IV, who later starved him to death.  But the crown had lost its sanctity, and Henry’s reign was marked by revolts led by nobles equally qualified for the crown. (see Shakespeare’s “Henry IV”).  Henry IV’s son, Henry V, was determined to win back the lost land in France, to prove his legitimacy to the throne and to show that God was on his side.  God might have indeed favored him, and he won a determinant victory in the battle of Agincourt in 1415.  After the Duke of Burgundy, John the Fearless, was murdered by the French, the Burgundians made alliance with the English, and helped Henry to enlarge his territory, from Aquitaine and Normandy to include Paris.  In 1420, Henry signed the Treaty of Troyes with Charles VI, by which Henry married Charles' beautiful 18 year old daughter Catherine of Valois, and Henry and his heirs would inherit the France crown after the decease of Charles VI. The Dauphin, Charles VII, was declared illegitimate.


Henry V died 2 years later at Vincennes, at the age of 25, and his 9 month old son, Henry VI, ascended the throne.  Henry’s brother John, Duke of Bedford and the regent of France, kept pushing the English occupied territory to the Loire, and laid siege to Orleans.  The appearance of the 17 year old Joan of Arc turned the tide against the English.  She raised the siege of Orleans in 1429, and the Dauphin was crowned king of France at Reims as Charles VII in the same year.  Although Joan was captured the following year, the resurgence of France didn’t slow down.  The hurried crowning of the 10 year old Henry VI in Paris didn’t help either, as Reims had been the official site of coronation for the anointed kings and carried special religious meaning in the mind of French people.  The death of the Duke of Bedford and the re-alliance of the French king with the Duke of Burgundy further shattered the dream of the French conquest of the English.  After 1450, the only land the English held was Gascony.  The Battle of Castillon (in Gascony) in 1453 finally ended the 100 Years War, and England lost her last French territory, Gascony.

3.            Templars’ fate

In 1118 or 1119, Hughes de Payens and 8 other knights founded the order of Knights Templar to devote themselves to the protection of Christian pilgrims to Jerusalem. The order was officially recognized by the pope in 1128, and St. Bernard presided over the writing of the Rules of the Order. Although the Templars vowed to live in poverty and chastity, the order soon became one of the wealthist institute in medieval Europe. The Templars' fortresses spread all over Europe. They were the earliest international bankers, as it's inconvenient for the Crusaders to carry large sum of money on their trips, they deposited the fund in one Templar's location then withdrew from another.

After the Christians were driven out of Palestine, the Templars had lost their original function.  However, they were still a strong military force, enjoying papal privileges, and did not pay tax.  The new king of France, Philip the Fair (grandson of St. Louis), was ambitious, cunning and badly needed money.  He had a French archbishop elected as the new pope (Pope Clement V), and the headquater of papacy was moved from Rome to Avignon.  The new pope thus became a tool in Philip's hand.  On Friday, Oct. 13, 1307, Philip had every Templar in France (about 5000) arrested and imprisoned. They were tortured and forced to confess crimes such as heresy, idolatry, homosexuality, obscene rituals, etc..  The Grand Master Jacques de Molay and the Preceptor of Normandy, Geoffroi de Charney, both later retracted their confessions and insisted their innocence.  Both were condemned to burn at the stake in Paris on March 18, 1314.  At his death, the Grand Master cried out: "God knows who is wrong and has sinned.  Soon a calamity will occur to those who have condemned us to death."  God may have heard him, as Pope Clement died a month later, and King Philip died in an accident before the end of the year.

Carlo gave a brief, but excellent lecture on the Templars. It's a pity that the time was too short.  I wsih he had been given at least one hour to talk about this subject. 

4.            The Wars of Religion.

The French Wars of Religion (1562–98) were a series of conflicts between French Catholics and Huguenots (French Calvinists). The conflict involved the factional disputes between the aristocratic houses of France, led by the House of Bourbon (Conde) and the House of Guise (Lorraine), and both sides received assistance from foreign sources.

It’s generally agreed that the Massacre of Vassy (Duke of Guise massacred protestants in Vassy) in 1562 began the War of Religion, and the Edict of Nantes (1598) concluded the wars, although many believe that the Peace of Alais in 1629 was the actual conclusion.




**************************************************************************

2011 Pilgrim Trip in France

Pilgrimage:  Journey to a sacred site in search of spiritual significance.

Medieval pilgrimage sites: 
*Holy Land – long and dangerous, especially after Jerusalem fell in the hands of Turks.
*Rome – difficult for non-Italians, because of the high Alps.
*Santiago de Compostela (where St. James’ body was buried, said to have arrived miraculously on a stone boat) – This route is easier compared to the other 2, although still dangerous.  Pilgrims had to settle his financial and family affairs before leaving home. They went in groups for safety.  Poor people couldn’t go until they finished their service for their lords.  Thus, many pilgrims were old and not in good physical shape. It was not uncommon for pilgrims to die on the route.  Rich people could pay others to go on pilgrimage for them.  It took at least a year to finish the round trip.  We already know the clothes, hat, and symbols of the pilgrims.

This pilgrim route we took begins at Le Puy-en-Velay and ends in Santiago de Compostela, in Spain.  We went through the Spanish part about 10 years ago. (It was very well described in Paolo Coelho’s short novel “The pilgrimage”.  If interested, Rong-rong has the book in Chinese translation.)  The French part has 4 routes; one of them starts at Le Puy.  Le Puy is in the area of the Massif Central, the area of Languedoc/Occitans.  It’s the cradle for the poetry and music of the troubadours.  (Troubadours were popular between 1100 to 1350, spreading from the south of France to Spain and Italy. It died out after the Black Death.)  The countryside is rather hilly, very beautiful.  R.L. Stevenson’s “Travel with a Donkey in the Cevennes” also mentioned Velay, although most places he visited were close by, in the Camisard region, but not on the route of the pilgrimage.  We ended our tour at Toulouse, not too far from the Pyrenees (Spanish border).

Le Puy-en-Velay

The cathedral of Our Lady (left) is a UNESCO site. The earliest part was built in the 5th century (after an apparition of the Virgin). It was expanded several times and finally finished in the 12th century. The style is rather unique, difficult to classify, said to have an Arab influence.  Le Puy was the departure point of the pilgrimage to Santiago Compostela.  Also, Pope Urban II preached the First Crusade (400 crusaders) in 1095 here, and appointed the town bishop to lead it.  The bishop was fatally wounded at Antioch, but others returned and brought with them knowledge of Oriental arts and architecture.  In the Middle Ages, Le Puy was the most important shrine to Mary in France. Six Popes came to Le Puy.  Many kings, including Charlemagne, St. Louis, and Francis I, also came here as pilgrims.  Unfortunately, the original “Black virgin” (brought back from the Middle East or Egypt) was lost, and the replacement made in the 10th century was again destroyed during the French Revolution.  Now what remains is a copy of the first copy.  The Jubilee of Le Puy is when the Annunciation Day coincides with Good Friday.  The last one was in 2005.

There was a special exhibition in the museum “Mary in Catholic and Muslim religions”.  It included Titian’s painting “The Virgin with the white rabbit.”  I wanted to go to see if there’s any explanation for the mysterious white rabbit.  For it we climbed the stairs twice. (The cathedral is situated on top of a hill.)  I was very disappointed to find no explanations.  The posted text only said art historians are as puzzled as I am.
  
The cathedral

St. Michael rock/needle (right) is a small medieval chapel on top of a rocky hill. It takes 268 steps to climb to the chapel of St. Michael.  The sculptures on the tympanum are well preserved.  The carvings immediately above the gate are somewhat curious to me.  It shows 2 mermaids, one with a snake tail, another a fish tail, representing those dead on land and sea.  Inside the chapel there’s a 14-15th century wooden statue of St. Michael slaying the dragon.  The 12-13th century murals have mostly faded, and it was dark inside the chapel.  I couldn’t make much out of it, despite the explanation of the guide. 

St. Michael Rock

There is also a gigantic, pink statue of the Virgin “Our Lady of France” on top of a hill.  It’s built in the 19th century.

Lace-making museum
I had read several French 19th century novels/short stories mentioning lace-making and lace-makers in this region, but this is the first time I saw how it’s done. The pattern is fixed by many pins, and the knitting is done by hand using numerous bobbins.  A small piece for a tea pot cushion costs 68 Euros in the museum shop.  Cheap ones are sold in shops in the city, but the designs are not as elaborate.  The museum guide said that she could tell if the lace is made by hand or machine with a single glance. Of course, I can’t tell any difference.


Estaing- a small fairy tale-like village on the route


Conques – a small village with a population of less than 100, but it has a magnificent church, as it was a popular pilgrimage site in medieval times. The reason:  The body of St. Foy, a 12 year old virgin martyr who died in 303 AD, was there.  The body was stolen by the Conques monks from Agen in the 9th century. (Stealing relics was not considered a sin in the Middle Ages.)  A church was built to house the relic and it was expanded again in 11th century because the site is on the route of the pilgrimage to Santiago. In the treasury we saw the case containing her relics (reliquary): it is in the shape of a pure gold statue of the saint, encrusted with numerous jewels donated by the pilgrims. Its head looks rather masculine. It might have belonged to another statue and was “transplanted” later.  The reliquary was hidden during the French Revolution and thus escaped the general fate of other reliquaries, i.e., being melted down by the government.

The church is Romanesque style.  The well preserved tympanum in the main façade showing the Last Judgment is a masterpiece of Romanesque sculptures
  


Albigensian Crusade

Now we entered the area of the Cathars of the Middle Ages.  The Cathar religion took its source from the East, which believed that there is a good God and an evil God. This belief was taken from the Manicheans.  It rejected the Catholic Church, the sacraments and the incarnation of Jesus Christ, and aimed to return to the purity of early Christian times. The Cathar priests, whom their followers called “the perfect ones”, led an exemplary life, in contrast to the corrupt Catholic clergy at that time. 

Pope Innocent III asked the Count of Toulouse, Raymond VI to help him in his efforts to suppress the heresy, but was refused.  (Raymond was later excommunicated.)  St. Dominic (a Spanish saint whose full name was Domingo de Guzmán, founder of the Order of the Dominicans) was called in to help to suppress the growing movement of the Cathars (or “Cathari”) but his preaching to them seemed also ineffective. He was convinced that these heretics would only pay attention to him when they saw that Catholic priests led as austere a life as the Cathars themselves. He failed again, even though he embraced extreme poverty, walking barefoot to the Cathar region and leading a life purer than that of Cathar priests.  Then the papal legate was murdered.  So the Pope proclaimed that a Crusade was necessary to put out the heresy.  He asked for the help of the French king, Philip II (Auguste), but Philip was too occupied with other business (probably trying to get Normandy back from King John of England.)  However, powerful feudal lords at the north answered the pope, formed a strong army and marched south in 1209.  The leader, Simon de Montfort, a minor aristocrat and a cruel soldier, massacred the entire population (20,000 or 60,000 people) of the city of Bezier and burned down the town. No one was spared, because the Catholic inhabitants fought side by side with their Cathar neighbors against the invaders.  Carcassonne resisted for a few months and then surrendered.  The inhabitants’ lives were spared, but their punishment consisted in being driven out of town entirely naked.  Other towns, including Albi, surrendered without a fight.

However, the victory of the Crusaders was transient.  The tide turned against them. By 1211, Count Raymond of Toulouse had liberated more than 30 towns.  He formed an ally with Peter II of Aragon, his brother-in-law, in 1213.  They were defeated.  Peter died and Raymond fled to England.  In 1216, Raymond returned and Montfort was killed in battle in 1218.

Raymond died in 1222 and was succeeded by his son, Raymond VII, who continued the resistance.  In 1225, King Louis VIII of France, hankering after the riches of the South, led a new crusade against the Cathars.  Most towns surrendered.  Avignon resisted for a while, then also surrendered. But Louis VIII soon died of illness, and the Queen Regent signed a treaty with Raymond VII in 1229.  Although the Count still kept a large part of his land, according to the treaty he had to marry his daughter and heiress to the younger brother of Louis IX (St. Louis).  This proved an advantageous move for the king, as there being no issue from this marriage, the territory of Count of Toulouse went to the French crown in 1271.

The Albigensian Crusade lasted 20 years, from 1209 to 1229.

The last stronghold of the Cathars, Montségur, fell in 1244.  The siege and massacre there are detailed in Zoe Oldenbourg’s book “Massacre at Montsegur”.

The Church set up the Inquisition in 1233 to eradicate the Cathar heresy.  Pope Innocent IV allowed the use of torture in 1252. This Inquisition was put in place 2 centuries earlier than the infamous Spanish one.  It lasted near a century.


Cordes-sur-Ciel – a beautiful medieval village in the mountains

Cordes-sur-ciel, a “bastide”, was founded by Raymond VII in 1222 to accommodate the Carthar refugees.  The walls were fortified.  But after the treaty of 1229, Cordes-sur-ciel was yielded to the French crown.

Albert Camus once said: “In Cordes, everything is beautiful, even regret.”


Gaillac

We stopped by the 13th century St. Michael Abbey (Benedictine) for wine tasting.  I fell asleep during the lecture, and of course, I drank nothing during the tasting. 


Albi

The cathedral of St. Cecilia is another UNESCO site. Albi surrendered to the Crusaders in 1209, after the fall of Carcassone, and was annexed to the French crown in 1226.  To celebrate the victory over the Cathars, the bishop of Albi decided to build a cathedral; construction began in 1282 and it took nearly 100 years to finish. The style of the cathedral is rather peculiar. It looks more like a fortress than a church. (I don’t understand why they built it like a fortress.  The war was over by then.)   


St. Cecelia, the patron saint of musicians, was beheaded, but according to legend didn’t die immediately.  She lived for 3 more days after the execution and received the last sacrament. The Renaissance sculptor Stephano Maderno (1576-1636) made a beautiful sculpture of “the martyrdom of St. Cecelia. (The original is in the Trastevere church in Rome.)  There’s a colored marble copy of this sculpture in a chapel of the cathedral.

My photos of the famous mural of the Last Judgment are out of focus.  Here’s one from the internet.  Note the center part of the painting was cut out to make room for another altar.  The choir is magnificent and the statues of the saints all around the choir are beautiful. (Sorry, no photos.)

Albi also has a big Toulouse-Lautrec museum. (T-L was born in Albi.)   The building was once the Bishop’s palace where the Inquisition was located.


Castres

We stopped by the Goya Museum in the village of Castres.  It has a large collection of Spanish paintings (second largest of Hispanic art in France), but only 3 Goya paintings. The largest Goya work is rather uninteresting to my eyes.  But I do like his self-portrait (when he was 52).  We were really lucky that there was a special exhibition of Goya’s prints (82 in total) of the series known as “The disasters of war”.  He began to work on them when he was 62, and it took him 10 years to complete.  The original title was Fatal consequences of Spain's bloody war with Bonaparte, and other emphatic caprices.  Many of them are nightmarish and horrifying.
  

Sorèze

In Sorèze, we stayed at the Royal Abbey School.  The abbey was founded by Pepin the Short, and I think (not sure) the military school was established by Louis XVI. (I missed the 1st part of the guided tour.)  The statue of Louis XVI in the yard is the only one that survived the French Revolution.

Frank was very impressed by the Abbey School because at one time it was directed by a famous 19th century Catholic priest, Henri Lacordaire, whose ideas had a world-wide influence, especially in Latin America and Mexico; his name was pronounced with reverence by the Catholics at the time of religious turmoil in Mexico. There are many mementos of the great man at this School. Lacordaire had been a lawyer and an intellectual before he took his vows as priest in the first half of the 19th century. He was supremely eloquent, and caused a great stir among the educated class with his sermons, some of which he delivered in the Cathedral of Notre Dame in Paris. He advocated de reinstatement of the religious Orders, all of which had been banned from France during the French Revolution. Since he was a fervent Catholic and favored the return of the religious Orders, Frank, not knowing much about the man and having read none of his work,  had the impression that father Lacordaire probably had been a highly conservative, ultra-rightist and perhaps bigoted priest. He favored especially the Dominicans (historically associated with the infamous Inquisition), because they had been more concerned with education. However, the demoiselle that guided the tourist group through the Abbey School, constantly emphasized Lacordaire’s liberal and progressive views in education. This was probably so, since students of different religious creeds were admitted at the School during his tenure (including Muslims and Buddhists). Also, Lacordaire had been a student and associate of a controversial Catholic-priest-philosopher-political activist, Lamennais, who eventually became excommunicated because of his highly liberal views, and his attempt to combine Catholicism with some political ideas born of the French Revolution. (Frank expanded this paragraph.)

There are lots of pictures and drawings of the life of the students at this school: their activities, their games, their uniforms, and so on. It was very impressive to see the lists of students who graduated from the School in the long history (century and a half?) of its existence. The names are written in lists with fine calligraphy in parchments that are framed and hanged on the walls; one can read names of students who later became prominent, and who came to study at Soreze from places as far apart as KoreaSalvadorMexicoEgypt, etc.

Dourgne Benedictine abbey
We attended a high mass there, listening to the monks singing Gregorian chant.  It happened to be Sacred Heart Festival day.  They have a huge yard – at least 10 acres by my estimate.

Durfort

A small, beautiful, sleepy town with many artisan’s shops, mostly copperware.  According to a local old man, now there’re more English and American immigrants in this village than the French.  Indeed, we found an English couple – both painters- set up their workshop there.
  
Toulouse

Toulouse was the capital of the Visigoth kingdom in the 5th century. Later it was part of Aquitaine, and then went under the Count of Toulouse.  The town is encircled by the Garonne River.  The “old bridge” was built in 11-12th  (??) century, and the “New Bridge”, a much taller one, was built in 16th – 17th century. It took more than a century to build it!  The Canal du Midi (connecting Toulouse to the Mediterranean, a UNESCO heritage) was made in 17th century.

St. Sernin Basilica
St. Sernin was a 3rd century bishop of Toulouse who was martyred and dragged by a bull.  A church was built at his burial site.  In 11th century it was decided that a new, larger church was needed to accommodate the large number of pilgrims, and the Pope came to Toulouse to consecrate its altar and to bless the Crusaders led by Count Raymond IV.* It was finished in 13th century.  We still can see his emblem everywhere in the city.

  

*Note:  [The First Crusade, a barbarous invasion of the Middle East, was mostly a French, or more accurately, Frankish, affair, with some participation of the Italian Normans. Raymond was the only Crusade leader that was praised by the Byzantine historian, Princess Anna Comnena.  After occupying Antioch, a priest in Raymond’s camp claimed that the Holy Lance – the lance that pierced Christ – was found. (It’s probably a fake). The morale of the crusaders was boosted by the precious relic and they won a decisive victory over the Turks (Seljuk).  Raymond also played a crucial role in the sacking of Jerusalem.  For it he was once offered the crown of Jerusalem but refused.  (Bohemond of Taranto took the crown).  After his defeat in the Crusade of 1101, Raymond was imprisoned by the regent of Antioch, Bohemond’s nephew, Tancred.  (Note:  This Tancred is not the Tancredi in Rossini’s opera.)  Having failed to gain territories for himself, Raymond marched on to Tripoli (in Syria and Lebanon).  The County of Tripoli was established and remained under Christian control until 13th century, when the ruler of Tripoli swore vassalage to the Mongol Empire and was later vanquished by the Egyptian sultan when Mongols were defeated in Egypt.]


The Jacobins Convent

The first stone of the abbey was laid down in 1229, then the church went through a series of enlargement, remodeling and raising.  The Jacobins were Dominicans, called Jacobins (not to be confused with the radical political ideologists of that name in the French Revolution) because one of their convents was located on Rue St. Jacques in Paris.  The order was founded by St. Dominic.  After his death, the Dominicans were assigned the task of the Inquisition.  The most important relics in the church were the bones of St. Thomas Aquinas, a Dominican and Doctor of the Church.  He died in Italy (in a Cistercian abbey at Fossanova) in 1274, and was canonizes in 1323. By a bull of the Pope (14th century) his bones were transferred here, to Toulouse  The monks jealously guarded the relics, especially because the region was prone to anarchy, ever since the Pope moved to Avignon in 1309.  They hid the head of the Saint in the St. Benedict Church in Piperno, and entrusted the remaining bones to a Count who kept them in his castle.  Since the Dominicans had asked the remains of the saint to be returned to them, a bull of the Pope (14th century) ordered them transferred to Toulouse.  Two Dominican friars put the precious relics in a chest, and carried by a donkey.  They were stopped and searched in Florence, but the guards ignored the donkey.  Thus, they safely traveled north, passed through the Alps, and finally arrived at Toulouse, where they were welcomed by 150,000 faithful, led by the duke and the archbishop.


This church is not in use now except for weddings.  (All abbeys we encountered in this trip were Benedictines.  This is the only Dominican abbey, but not in use.  I wonder why.)

This was our final destination.  Note that Toulouse is on another route, i.e., the Provençal route, of the pilgrimage.